Friday, July 30, 2010

Believe it, Love it, Live it

   Defining the modern liberal bent or their general social conduct after 70+ years of analysis and as accurately as possible, leads one ultimately too the animal level of thought or thinking, they function psychologically like mal- adjusted domesticated dogs that bite the hand that feeds and cares for them and would sooner attack their owner than a home intruder. They crap where they live and eat, hump your leg, then piss on it, and act like they are in charge of everyone around them, like an alpha dog. When turned loose on society they pack-up like all pack animals limited in size only by the alpha dog leaders of their packs. Each pack will viciously attack in the most personal and life threatening way, anyone or other pack without remorse, when they find themselves at cross purpose to each other. They will chew off there own leg when caught in a trap too only be destroyed by the rest of the pack due to their physical handicap or perceived weakness. They are firm believers of the coercive social commune by the tyranny of the pack as much so as all the human barbarians’ and savages of history where the “individual” is an expendable commodity of the group or pack.
                                                     Excerpt from the Declaration of Independence
Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. (Declaration of independence)
   Representatives of congress and the senate where specifically to represent their constituency within the limits set by the Constitution not their own political interests within the governmental elite.
  The parties that form in the private sector to encourage voters to pick these representatives or another have no official place or authority in the governance of a free people. Their party platforms are not substitutes for the Constitution.
   The press although mentioned in the constitution as to be free from government, does not give it an official or legal roll in governance, the same for religions.
   The congress has the constitutional authority to set its own rules but that does not include extra constitutional rules such as forming caucuses or cabals that have the right to exclude any other elected member who wishes to participate only equal representation of their constituents is constitutional. Nor should political parties hold any official place of authority within governance, the people don’t elect parties we elect representatives. And gerrymandering of districts based on any thing but geography to achieve some perceived parity is also unconstitutional. Segregation or integration by individual choice is freedom, segregation or integration by law is unconstitutional that’s all gerrymandering does. Every law created that is not in accordance with the Constitution is null and void even if the Supreme Court says otherwise.
   All of the above is the truth of the corruption that prevails in the American government today.  
   Even the people who elect a person to a government position like an avowed Socialist, Marxist, Islamism, Anarchists etc. cannot expect to legally change our Constitution and or laws outside of it and any attempt to do just that is unconstitutional and will result in only one way, Revolution!

Friday, July 23, 2010

The Argument

   The problems in American society today when all the rhetoric is synthesized to its core ingredient is nothing more then the proper role of government in the lives of people. This argument was thoroughly debated during our founding by far more intelligent men/women then we find in the debate of today and nothing in the human condition has changed save our technology. All the arguments about energy, the environment, government etc. are just so much social and political distraction from the real issue, which is America’s founding and resultant form of government. So unless someone in today's argument can show something that has change about the human condition in the intervening years what the hell are we arguing about? 
   It is obvious when researched that in every debate among men there are winners and losers just like in wars and the vanquished among men never or rarely accept defeat especially in the realm of the intellect, generation after generation.
   What they do, do is create a mythology that it wasn’t the weakness of their arguments but other factors that they can somehow overcome in their next efforts, even if they have to resort to force taking it out of the realm of human intellect while avoiding the original argument they lost in the past, by distorting the past. They see this effort as academic and presume themselves to be more intelligent via the human ego. This holds to their lack of intelligence in their arguments, when they have to lie and distort the past and ultimately use coercion and force, to bring about what they see as the truth of their arguments, which is precisely why they lost the arguments in the debate many generations ago against more intelligent men/women than themselves.
   The strange thing about the truth of fact is once it becomes manifest to the human mind it will always remain the truth in perpetuity. The truth cannot be destroyed or changed, like death once manifest to the human mind even though some may not understand it, it is.
   The ignorance and avarice of man may well destroy America in time, but the truths of America will live in the minds of men/women for ever, and our Constitution is the pinnacle of the most intelligent group of men/women this world has ever known.
   Knowledge and the understanding that should be attached to it, is where wisdom comes into play, but the ego of man is the destroyer of that wisdom, in particular the ego of celebrity.
   All men/women develop an ego which is locked into their subjective personality as they live their lives. The only personal aspect of our beings that can limit and or control the personal ego we all develop, is our objective minds.
  The ego of which I speak is both self pride and self deceit to which it denies acknowledgement of either. It is like a spirit that has no form or structure, and can generally only be seen by others in the aggregate of our civil activities, quite often after the fact. It does give off subtle signals but most others miss them in the fog of celebrity until the individual achieves a full blown egotistical presence among society. The ego needs no personal encouragement; it develops to one degree or another, but unjustifiable encouragement of it is detrimental to all of society. Encouragement to achieve should never be pursued through the individual ego, but through the objective reasoning of the mind. Remember that the next time you tell your children they are special, other than to yourself.
   No living human bares responsibility for the circumstances of their birth, thus self pride or self deceit has no bearing on their linage, future or ego in the real world of our existence. History is to be learned from as to what should be emulated and what should be rejected in the here and now, absent the influence of ego. Therein is the wisdom of the ages that can provide a better future for all mankind.
   The passing of any single man or group of mankind in the grand scheme of time, amounts to either positive or negative glitches overall to be enjoyed or endured by the present, but we should not let our human history get us  locked in the cyclic patterns of the rest of the animal life of this world. America has taught us better than that, I would hope.
  F. A. Hayek made the observations about societies of men and the cause and effect of their ultimate destruction. As I see it, is always do to the presumptions and the acquired powers of egotistical people within, that they, can provide and or fine tune civil and or social systems that took millions to develop over time.
   American society is not a system in the sense that it was created by other than trial and error through the minds of    millions and has, at its base a simple document of intent to show the way. Declare the Constitution obsolete declares the entirety of American society obsolete.

Saturday, July 17, 2010

Leaders ?

   A lesson mankind has learned and unlearned time and again over its history “man is not a herd animal by instinct that needs a leader”. Human leaders most always mislead those that surrender their individuality to them.
   This lesson or lack of; is what leads man toward what we call the collective, and away from the individuality that makes mankind the supreme animal on earth. When ever a man follows another it must be because they individually perceive intellectually that it’s the correct course of action, not because of the cult like presence of the leader. This otherwise makes us susceptible to being misled or robot like. In plain language individuals should never follow another out of intellectual blindness like herd animals. Man by his very nature is a lobo animal.
   Every man/women that lays claim to the mantel of leadership is a false leader of man. Even the most reluctant of mans leaders becomes in time misleaders unintentionally, do to the ego of celebrity which is the bastard of mankind. Every society in the history of man that has succumbed to the ego of celebrity is and always has been a bastard of humanity.
   Because man is by his nature a lobo animal, all collectives of man both large and small through the ego of celebrity are creations that inhibit individuality, leading us toward our own destruction.
   Americans by the 1700 s became aware do to the circumstance of their migration to a land without a single over bearing ruling elite authority, making them dependant on their individuality. Once individuality becomes manifest to the mind it becomes a live free or die mindset. This is also why, that during the formation of our government the federal was to have as little as possible authority over the individual, where security of the whole was to be its overriding mandate. Americans never saw themselves as part of any collective with the exception of security and even then loosely connected, based first on their individual judgments of circumstances.
   The human idea of the collective was by design to enslave the many to the few based on the theory that safety can only be secured by numbers, so individuality must be surrendered to the whole, thus The beginning of human slavery and tyranny.
   The theory of collective power binds the minds of mankind keeping us from achieving our ultimate destiny by confining us to the physical condition of slaves instead of individual intelligent enlightenment, the pathway set for we Americans, by our forefathers.

Saturday, July 10, 2010

Basic American Law

  Neither an individual citizen nor group thereof has the right or the liberty to differ or contradict the original Declaration of Independence or the Constitution of the United States of America. Those founding documents are the core of all American law. To differ or contradict those fixed laws makes all those that do so Outlaws. It is not open to discussion, that American discussion was done with once they were adopted and agreed to and if anyone or group does not like it as it was/is is free to leave America for what they may see as a better system but not free to change the one we Americans have fought and died to defend all these many years since established.
"[W]e ought to deprecate the hazard attending ardent and susceptible minds, from being too strongly and too early prepossessed in favor of other political systems, before they are capable of appreciating their own." --George Washington, letter to the Commissioners of the District of Columbia, 1795

   Freedom of speech allows anyone or group to criticize our founding documents that is not the same as trying to effect a change in them or disregard them to satisfy ones avarice.
   In every society there are people that live with the overwhelming envy of others, it rules their thinking and opposition to any and all that are perceived better off in their lives than they. Because of this envy they will try anything to destroy and bring down, and they should be happy for the successes of others because it presents possibilities to their own pursuits in life while trying to emulate in order to raise themselves to the best of their ability within society and all its established laws of conduct.
   When people are envious of others it makes them blind to their own potential and abilities, it is a hurdle that cannot be overcome until envy is set aside it is the heaviest of social burdens that many bear from birth. In America there are no legal obstacles only challenges to the future for any individual. If you think you have found a legal obstacle to your pursuit of happiness it is in fact an illegal obstacle placed their in spite of our Constitution by the envy of others and you should make it your first order of business to see it is remove.
   None of what I have written here will make sense to anyone who has not availed him/herself of the knowledge and understanding of the laws contained within Americas founding and the men/women whom founded her.
   All Americans today need to stop waiting for someone else to tell them what the laws are and find out on your own while we still have the freedom to do it.

Friday, July 2, 2010

Principled Sovereignty

"[T]he opinion which gives to the judges the right to decide what laws are constitutional and what not ... would make the judiciary a despotic branch. ... [T]he germ of dissolution of our federal government is ... the federal Judiciary ... working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief, over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall be usurped. ... They are construing our constitution from a co-ordination of a general and special government to a general and supreme one alone." --Thomas Jefferson

   Our American Constitution established the literal primary Sovereign Authority was “THE PEOPLE” as individuals among all other people. The second Sovereign Authority was of the State among all other states, lastly the federal authority of the Republic sovereign among all other nations of the world, where assuring the States of their territorial integrity and sovereignty and our individual sovereignty was to be its primary mandate.
   This was the triad of sovereign authority and powers making up the governance of America. Laced up straightly within the Declaration Of Independence and the Constitution intended for perpetuity, thus no level of American government has sovereign right or authority to claim sovereignty and/or franchise of permission over the individual sovereignty of its sovereign citizens under our Constitution, except during extreme emergencies or hazard to the people as a whole or the Republic, and then only temporarily to its resolution.
   The federal has no cultural sovereign authority over the states the states have no cultural sovereign authority over the people not specifically surrendered in the Constitution. From the time we as a society lost that understanding and intent we opened, “Pandora’s box” and an insurgency of human nature started a crusade of corruption on the country as a whole. (This before the ink was barely dry.)
    By violating the boundaries of any of our sovereign authorities we destroy the literal text, meaning and intent of our Constitution not only to ourselves but the world, which for two hundred and twenty two years has stood in awe of us as a Nation and as a Sovereign people. The absolute and true American Dream defined, was and still is Individual Sovereignty.
   No level of American government, not federal, state, city or town holds cultural sovereignty over the people. We are our own sovereigns individually under the Constitution. Americas’ system of governance with its triad of sovereign authorities was intended to eliminate once and for all the despotic elements of human nature from it.
   The method of despotism historically has been one man/woman rule. Modern men and women do not recognize or realize that despotism doesn’t have to emanate from the single source of a despot like a king, dictator or other such tyrants. Despotism can and does come from groups or committees through human nature and the consensus of their members. This is just as threatening to liberty and the individual sovereignty of citizens as any single despot or tyrant. This is why all collective systems become tyrannical and despotic via the consensus in time of their leaders.
   We Americans have been so complacent during all these years of progressive (liberal) infringement on individual sovereignty and the liberties we all enjoyed that we almost suckered for the premise that any and all responsibilities we gave to government are exclusive to government.
   They did this as example; if an individual was under attack they claimed exclusive rights of our defense, meaning we had no right to defend ourselves we had to wait and defer to their arrival, and especially no right to harm the assailant in anyway with out the threat of potential prosecution.
   The founding fathers constitutionally assigned some limited responsibilities to government some exclusive some not but they never in their wildest dreams thought that if the government failed in its commissions that we the people had to just sit back and take the resultant effect, like illegal immigration. You can’t get any more progressively ignorant than that. Only an ignorant person teaches his/her kids that when attacked, just stand there and take it, or try to run, or report it later. We are American; and that kind of “bullshit” don’t wash, we are sovereign individually; when we are failed we will do it ourselves!! (Just ask old King George)